Debra Capadona

Senior TPM / program delivery leader for complex, regulated environments β€” focused on judgment, composure, and shipping systems that hold up under scrutiny.

Working System Overview

To demonstrate how I use AI as a force multiplier, I selected a moderately complex, real-world use case and built a complete, end-to-end system. The goal was not novelty, but execution: clear architecture, disciplined data handling, and prompt design that produces reliable, repeatable outputs.

If you only have a minute: open the system, scan the outputs, then come back for the operating model.

Executive Profile

This profile summarizes delivery posture and leadership approach; detailed experience, roles, and timeline are in the resume. The goal here is simple: make it easy to evaluate judgment, operating model, and evidence.

βš–οΈ
Regulated, high-stakes delivery β€” programs where correctness, controls, and auditability matter as much as speed.
🧠
Sound judgment under uncertainty β€” decisions made with explicit tradeoffs, crisp scope, and clear accountability.
🧊
Composed, low-drama execution β€” calm operational tempo even when the work is messy and the stakes are real.

Operating Model

A repeatable approach for complex delivery β€” designed to avoid "confidently wrong" outcomes.

🧩
Decompose β€” define boundaries, contracts, checkpoints, and what "done" means.
🧱
Architect β€” stable core, modular adapters, controlled extensibility.
πŸ”
Iterate β€” bounded MVP, validate, then expand deliberately.

How the System Was Built (AI-Enabled, Human-Governed)

The system is an intentionally bounded MVP: repeatable runs, explainable outputs, and explicit constraints. AI accelerates implementation and documentation β€” decision authority stays human.

🧠
Prompt design as a delivery tool β€” prompts are written like interfaces: purpose, constraints, and output contracts.
πŸ“¦
Output contracts β€” structured outputs (schemas, checklists, diffs) over free-form prose.
πŸ›‘οΈ
Guardrails β€” constrain outputs, detect drift, and document in/out-of-scope boundaries.
πŸ§ͺ
Verification loops β€” edge cases, counterexamples, and "what breaks?" checks are first-class.
πŸ—οΈ
3-tier architecture β€” ingestion β†’ scoring β†’ visualization, designed for repeatability and extension.
πŸ—„οΈ
Disciplined data handling β€” consistent structure, clear provenance, and repeatable runs you can audit.

GenAI & Prompting Pages

These pages document how GenAI was used in practice: prompts as interfaces, structured outputs, and verification loops. They're intentionally written like build notes β€” so you can see how decisions were made and why the system is repeatable.

Evidence

The live system is the working artifact. This page exists to make the method legible: how ambiguity becomes a plan, how risk is managed, and how delivery stays controlled.

🧾
System β€” interactive views, corpus processing, and 9-dimension analysis.
🧠
Method β€” bounded MVP, explicit constraints, repeatable runs, explainable outputs.
🧭
Professional record β€” roles and delivery history are captured in the resume.